企业绩效管理网

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 1531|回复: 5

Clear out data hiding under calculations

[复制链接]

67

主题

355

帖子

520

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
520
QQ
发表于 2014-6-27 00:50:57 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Is there an easy way to clear out data that might be hiding underneath a dynamic calculation? Unlocking lines by validating picklist selections is the scenario and the problem is that unlocking a line after actuals have starting coming in brings back data that was hiding to a read only cell.

Thanks
回复

使用道具 举报

64

主题

404

帖子

556

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
556
QQ
发表于 2014-6-27 02:03:01 | 显示全部楼层
This is a real grey area of undocumented functionality.  Traditionally cell input data "hiding" under rule calculations was preserved in the cube, it was as if the rule calculations existed in a virtual cube veneer which was plastered on top of the physical cube but without any warning this changed in either 9.4 or 9.5 to a new model where leaf cells that were previously data entry becoming rule calculated had the effect of wiping out the former data entry. It was never clear if this data wiping required a save data or was instantaneous (I'm sure someone did the experiment and can share though).

However IBM seem aware of this contradiction of functionality as there is a new tm1s.cfg param RulesOverwriteCellsOnLoad which seems to be a switch to enable either the old way or the new way.  Not sure whether this param applies only to 10.1 or also to 9.5.2 though ...
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

66

主题

382

帖子

540

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
540
发表于 2014-6-27 02:34:37 | 显示全部楼层
lotsaram wrote:... It was never clear if this data wiping required a save data or was instantaneous (I'm sure someone did the experiment and can share though).

Funny you should mention it... I did test this once upon a time and the data was cleared as soon as a rule was applied to a cell.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

91

主题

437

帖子

644

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
644
QQ
发表于 2014-6-27 03:18:21 | 显示全部楼层
with 9.5.1 (CE 9.5), i get error message when i am try to write data on cells that are reference by rules using TI process. So i presume by default it can only be either or.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

70

主题

390

帖子

554

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
554
QQ
发表于 2014-6-27 03:33:27 | 显示全部楼层
asutcliffe wrote:[quote]lotsaram wrote:... It was never clear if this data wiping required a save data or was instantaneous (I'm sure someone did the experiment and can share though).

Funny you should mention it... I did test this once upon a time and the data was cleared as soon as a rule was applied to a cell.
[/quote]

Or accidentally deleted some elements from your dimension  

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

57

主题

378

帖子

507

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
507
发表于 2014-6-27 03:51:04 | 显示全部楼层
winsonlee wrote:with 9.5.1 (CE 9.5), i get error message when i am try to write data on cells that are reference by rules using TI process. So i presume by default it can only be either or.

That's a different question Winson, the OP was referring to the situation where you type in a number to a cell, then a rule is subsequently applied to that cell.  If that rule is then removed the value that was originally put in may still be there, depending on your version.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

QQ|手机版|小黑屋|企业绩效管理网 ( 京ICP备14007298号   

GMT+8, 2023-5-31 04:54 , Processed in 0.071105 second(s), 38 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.1 Licensed

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表