|
发表于 2014-6-22 07:11:06
|
显示全部楼层
rks1 wrote:That implies though, that there is no work-around?
Konstantin,
Only the last dimension in the cube can be used to define the measure type.
If you have created the cube with the dimension order, a work-around would be to use the "Re-Order Dimensions" feature to change the last dimension in the cube to your measure dimension. Jut right-click on the cube and you'll find the option.
This internally re-orders the dimensions and will make the measure dimension take precedence in determining the cell type. However, be warned that it is a little confusing for users, as the order shown in TM1 Perspectives will be the original dimension order, not the updated one.
This kind of thing shows a degree of inexperience, so perhaps it might help you to adopt a few "best practice" techniques on your project, to avoid development and maintenance issues in the future.
For instance, my own methodology is to have a measure dimension for each cube (even if there's only one measure), and to always name the measures dimension as the cube name followed by the word "Measure". This makes sure it is clear in both the dimension list and the cube that the function of the dimension is to contain measures.
If you're interested in some conventions to use, I wrote a a while ago that covers some good practices for developers. At the conclusion of the article, I have a sample document detailing naming conventions for TM1 objects.
You'll find it very helpful as you get further into the project to adhere to a naming convention and perform as much standardization as you can upfront. |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册
x
|